Thursday, March 19, 2009

Fort Collins Now, March 19, 2009, Thursday

Fort Collins Now

March 19, 2009, Thursday

Fort Collins Now

Fried: America is Having Labor Pains Birthing the Employee Free Choice Act

By Eric Fried

Since corporate America has been screaming bloody murder about the Employee Free Choice Act for months, you might be surprised to learn that it was only last week that Congressional Democrats officially re-introduced the bill. Big Business has fixated on the falsehood that the new law will take away employees' rights to a secret ballot union election, but what really terrifies them is knowing the act will level the playing field between American workers and employers. That's why all of us who work for a living have to do all we can to pass Employee Free Choice Act.

As usual, the best way to cut through the hype is to start with the facts. Right now, only about 1 in 8 American workers belongs to a union, down from a peak of 35 percent right after World War II. This is the lowest rate in the industrialized world, which explains why the U.S. also has the biggest gap between rich and poor and the worst health care system among developed nations. Because union workers get better pay, benefits, health care and pensions, declining unionization also explains why inflation-adjusted median family income has been falling for decades. Once enough of the nation's wealth was concentrated in too few hands, it led (as it always does) to a national economic crisis.

Corporate flacks tell us workers are free to join unions now, yet freely choose not to. Oh, really? According to a February 2005 Hart poll, 53 percent of America's nonunion workers wanted a union in their workplace. That's tens of millions of workers who want to join unions — yet less than 1 percent of them succeed annually. Why? Because employers blatantly violate current labor law knowing they will suffer little or no penalty for it.

A study by Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations shows that employers illegally fire at least one worker for union activity during organizing campaigns 25 percent of the time, hire union-busting consultants 75 percent of the time, and force employees to attend one-on-one anti-union meetings with their own supervisors 78 percent of the time. Using what is essentially psychological warfare, they figure out how you are going to vote and pressure you to vote against the union. There's your real intimidation and lack of a secret ballot right there.

It's gotten so bad, the highly respected international organization Human Rights Watch stated in 2000 that “Legal obstacles tilt the playing field so steeply against workers' freedom of association, that the United States is in violation of international human rights standards for workers.”

Under current law, unions can already be formed when a majority signs authorization cards (so-called “card check”). Unfortunately, the law gives that choice to the employers, who — surprise, surprise! — almost always opt instead for a union election, giving them time to bring in the Gucci-clad goons to stampede their employees. All the proposed legislation does is put that choice where it belongs — in the hands of the employees themselves. After all, it's their organization, so why do their bosses get to say how it is formed? If even 30 percent of the employees want a secret ballot under the proposed law, they can have one. The law also imposes much stiffer penalties for messing with employees' rights to form a union.

President Obama supports the Employee Free Choice Act , as does new Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis. Congresswoman Betsy Markey is one of 223 co-sponsors of the bill in the House. With its allies and front groups, the Chamber of Commerce has pledged to spend $200 million to defeat the bill, which it calls “a firestorm bordering on Armageddon.” Big Business is putting intense pressure on Colorado Senators Mark Udall and especially Michael Bennet, who must run for re-election in 2010. Bennet needs to hear from you, too. Let's remind him that we are the majority, and we want real freedom of choice at work.

Eric Fried is one of the 73 percent who support EFCA according to the newest Hart poll at eric@pvgreens.org.

The Buffalo News, March 19, 2009, Thursday

The Buffalo News

March 19, 2009, Thursday

The Buffalo News

Activists criticize city's lack of plan to fight poverty

Say Buffalo needs coordinated approach

By Mark Sommer


- It’s been more than three years since Byron W. Brown became mayor.

More than 1 1/2 years since Buffalo was named the second poorest city in the nation.

And a year since the mayor hired someone whose biggest priority was to fight poverty.

And yet, City Hall still doesn’t have an anti-poverty plan.

The lack of urgency has some people involved with poverty issues concerned.

“Poverty can’t be solved by charities,” said William O’Connell, executive director of Homeless Alliance for Western New York. “We need planning and strategic action, which has to come from our elected officials. We’re a community that comes together for so many things, but we haven’t had that call to action around poverty,” O’Connell said.

O’Connell is one of several people who say the Brown administration could be doing more to combat poverty.

Lou Jean Fleron, chairwoman of Buffalo’s Living Wage Commission, said a plan is needed that tackles the underlying problems of poverty. Having one, she said, also could help the city take advantage of stimulus funds designated for alleviating poverty, inequality and joblessness.

“It’s really, really urgent, and I don’t think we’re ready,” said Fleron, who also works on economic development for Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations. “There is a small window of time, and we would be best positioned as a city if a comprehensive plan were in place.”

In January, in his third State of the City address, Brown said that Buffalo’s “renaissance is in full swing.” An anti-poverty program, he announced, would be unveiled in February.

During that speech, Brown touted a drop in violent crime, highlighted economic development projects under way and pointed to a stepped-up effort to demolish blighted buildings.

Deputy Mayor Donna Brown told The Buffalo News last September that although developing an anti-poverty plan was supposed to be a priority, expanded responsibilities had left her little time in her first six months to focus on the issue. She said at the time a plan would be ready by January.

On Monday, Brown left a phone message saying she was “hoping” a plan could be out “within the next two weeks or so.”

A draft version has circulated among some organizations.

The delay has frustrated Michelle Johnson, a Housing Court liaison and co-founder of Broadway Fillmore Alive.

“When is poverty going to be taken seriously? Drive around the neighborhoods, especially the East Side, and tell me we don’t have this huge poverty issue that is being ignored. There is no plan, and we desperately need one,” Johnson said.

Helene Kramer, executive director of Read to Succeed Buffalo, said she was sympathetic to the difficulty of putting together a plan, given the “complex issue.” She said she eagerly awaits the direction the Brown administration will provide.

“There needs to be a big vision, and we’re anxiously awaiting the report so we can determine how to get behind it,” Kramer said.

VOICE Buffalo, which consists of 18 church congregations across Buffalo and the suburbs, has had some success in working with the Brown administration on anti-poverty issues, including neighborhood revitalization in the Woodlawn-Ferry area.

But Ava White, VOICE Buffalo’s president, said more needs to happen across the city.

“In general, there is more work that needs to be done around an aggressive strategy to work on the issues that get at the root of poverty,” White said.

Allison Duwe, executive director for the Partnership for the Public Good, which includes 40 organizations, said the clock is ticking.

“Many of our coalition members are ready and willing to be a part of the planning, part of the solution,” Duwe said.

msommer@buffnews.com

GRIT TV, March 18, 2009, Wednesday

GRIT TV

March 18, 2009, Wednesday

GRIT TV

What’s So Scary About Workers Organizing?

Gene Carroll was on Grit TV discussing the Employee Free Choice Act.

The Minnesota Independent, March 16, 2009, Monday

The Minnesota Independent

March 16, 2009, Monday

The Minnesota Independent

Business collapse can end union contracts, but not AIG bonus contracts

By Chris Steller

Contracts guaranteeing bonuses to executives at collapsing businesses — like American International Group (AIG) — are held inviolable, while labor union contracts regularly get voided or reneged-on when corporations declare (or even threaten) bankruptcy. Labor experts say it’s the law of the land.

Today President Obama told Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to find a way to stop AIG — which took in $170 billion in public bailout funds — from paying $165 million in executive bonuses. But even if Geithner succeeds, management’s preeminence in law will remain deeply seated in the American legal system.

The most local and recent example of workers whose contracts became casualties to corporate collapse are the Star Tribune’s pressmen. Only by caving to concession demands on Friday did they avoid having a bankruptcy judge void their contract. (The week began with news arising from the negotiations that the Star Tribune burned through as much as $11 million in a court battle with the rival Pioneer Press defending Par Ridder, the publisher who in 2007 oversaw half a year of the newspaper’s hurtle toward insolvency.)

As University of Minnesota Prof. John Budd tells the Minnesota Independent, it comes down to who calls the bankruptcy shots.

“I imagine that AIG could void its executive bonus contracts if it filed for bankruptcy,” he said. “But you have executives making the decision whether or not to file for bankruptcy so the right incentives are not there.”

Other experts say contrasting contract situations are only part of the picture. The real matter is one of “the different ways that workers are treated in this economic crunch from the ways [executives] are treated, law or no law,” says Peter Rachleff, professor of labor history at Macalester College.

“I have commented on this issue for years in my classes,” adds Prof. James Scoville, Budd’s Carlson School of Business colleague, who teaches ethics and labor relations.

Scoville cites a maxim by Jim Gross, professor of labor policy and labor arbitration at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations: “Property rights have trumped labor rights at every turn.”

Gross tells MnIndy he coined the phrase a decade ago in his book “Broken Promises: The Subversion of American Labor Relations Policy, 1947-1994.”

It has wide application as a general proposition, he says, “despite rhetoric to the contrary about workers’ rights and human rights.”

Contractual rules developed over centuries of common law overwhelmingly favor property owners and the management that serves them, in Gross’ view.

“The last time we had major labor law reform in favor of workers’ rights was in the Great Depression,” he says, and even as much as that era’s Wagner Act supported labor, its “underlying core principle was freedom of contract.”

The resulting balance of power between employers and unions “far favors employers in this country because we have employment at will,” says Gross.

The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) would bring United States’ labor policy into alignment with that of nearly every other developed country, he adds, but recent efforts for its passage are not encouraging.

CNY Link, March 16, 2009, Monday

CNY Link

March 16, 2009, Monday

CNY Link

Krause ends two-decade career as personnel officer

Martha E. Conway 03/16/09

Just about three months shy of what would have been her 23rd anniversary with Madison County, Personnel Officer Mary Krause announced her resignation March 4. The move puts Krause right where she left off in college: the Public Employment Relations Board.

A graduate of Liverpool High School and Cornell University’s School of Industrial Labor Relations, Krause began her career with Madison County as a technician trainee in June 1986. She was appointed personnel officer in August 1990.

Krause said she was pointed in the direction of labor relations through interest surveys taken in high school. She said she wound up applying to Cornell to pursue studies in the field.

“I arrived to find 90 percent of the class already knew they wanted to go to law school,” Krause said. “Myself, I wasn’t so sure.”

Krause said she always was interested and involved in student government in high school and student union in college. She said a lecture brought her interests in labor and government brought two loves together for her, and an internship in PERB brought her to seek opportunities that combined those interests.

“I found this job in the paper,” Krause said.

She moved to Canastota in 1990.

Krause credits her parents’ support of education as the cornerstone of her own love for learning.

“They made sure we did what we were expected to do,” Krause said, adding that her first six years of education began in Catholic school. “Between my parents and the foundation of my early education, I have always enjoyed learning. I always loved reading.”

Krause said the job is interesting by its very nature.

“Because it is so diverse,” Krause said. “Because we’re a multi-dimensional personnel department – labor relations, civil service, employee health and safety – and that’s the other opportunity that has been granted to me here at the county.”

Having to be a jack-0f-all-trades to navigate the broader responsibilities in the office have given Krause a broad base of knowledge, including a working knowledge of risk management, civil service administration, human resource management, employee benefits, policy and procedure development and the budget oversight responsibilities all county department heads have.

In addition, Krause served as budget officer in 2008 for the preparation of the 2009 budget. She said she also has served for four years on the county’s budget advisory committee.

Copier contract negotiations for the entire campus also was on her plate, and she said the many special projects she has worked on gave her the opportunity to work with others, such as helping to developing a purchasing policy.

“I visit the board [of supervisors] office almost daily,” Krause said. “Prior to the administrative assistant position being created, if there was something the board chairman or government operations chairman needed done, I was willing to do those things – they were fun to work on and interesting.”

Krause also served as the county’s Freedom of Information Law officer for years until County Administrator Paul Miller assumed those responsibilities earlier this year.

Since coming to the county, Krause said she earned her master of public administration.

“Madison County has always afforded its employees continuing employment and training opportunities, and I was someone who benefitted from that, as well,” Krause said.

Krause, active in state associations in her field, said Madison County has always supported association involvement.

“It’s not only the training programs that are extremely valuable,” Krause said. “It’s not cliché that networking opportunities are very valuable in sharing information with colleagues from across the state.”

Over the years, demands on municipal personnel departments have increased, Krause said.

“Employee safety requirements have increased exponentially since the early 1990s,” Krause said. “I credit the County Board of Supervisors for taking employee safety seriously. They have really supported the department’s training efforts.”

Krause said she and her staff have worked with a safety consultant to secure grants from the state Department of Labor for hazard abatement.

“We are in our seventh cycle of hazard abatement board grants to fund safety initiatives,” Krause said. “We have been able to share that information with other associations and explain how we apply for and receive HAB grants.”

Krause said the future of employment will likely be small business and consultancies.

“Some folks benefit from continued training, and there are some who need to consider seriously branching out on their own – say become a consultant in their area of expertise,” Krasue said. “That and small business is the way of the future. Evaluate your interests and your areas of expertise and how you can offer those services yourself.”

Krause said employees should always exhibit the personal characteristics in the interest and passion of what the company or employer provides and be willing to utilize skills and abilities to do that work but also to extend themselves more, whether through training or additional duties.

It’s not unusual for young adults to wind up on a different path than the one they chose out of high school, Krause said.

“There has to be an allowance that everyone has a different path and can have many different twists, turns and stops,” Krause said. “It probably makes parents more comfortable if they feel their kids know what they’re doing when they graduate. But we all change. Interests change. We find more and different career paths we can follow. We have a society and economy in which people will hold a number of jobs and they might be very different jobs. We are able to do and be employed in the areas we are most interested and passionate about. It is very acceptable to not be able to answer the question, ‘What do you want to do?’”

Mentors are essential, Krause said, and people need not knock themselves to find them.

“If we stick to our interests and passions, the mentors come,” Krause said. “The people who can maybe point us in the right direction … we end up bumping into those folks. Try something you may or may not be interested in. There are many resources in the community – our Career and Training Center, for one. They can help identify areas people are passionate about. It’s all about a process, and it’s okay to have many stops along the way.”

Krause invokes the name of Francis Perkins, secretary of labor during the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration.

“She knew that’s what she wanted to do,” Krause said. “She didn’t want to run for office. I enjoy being a doer, part of the administration of government, and I’m not going to rule out down the road sometime in the future running for some political body. But I like being a political appointee.”

During her time with Madison County, Krause has worked under four board chairmen and six Government Operations Committee chairmen.

“I attribute my ability to work with people in that role with my respect and understanding of that role and position,” Krause said. “Even though a new face was put on the face of board chairman at different times, my job as personnel director was to work with them. All of them have individual characteristics, but they’ve all been good men to work with and for. Some may rely on committee chairmen more than others, and some may keep responsibilities more within their office than others, but that was really more about how they organized and did their work.”

Krause said she learned something from each Government Operations Committee chairman.

“Gordon Hull, John Gladney, Rick Bargabos, Alex Stepanski, Dave Puddington, John Henderson … it is interesting to observe that each of them were and are effective Government Operations Committee chairs,” Krause said. “There were small differences in how they conducted meetings and how much information they wanted ahead of time. There was one I spoke with on an almost daily basis, then some just before the meeting. Others wanted a meeting before the meeting, but each of them was very interested and invested in the responsibilities of the committee.”

The best part of the job is coming in every day and doing different things.

“The best part of the job is the diversity,” Krause said.

The responsibilities cross every segment of public service, Krause said, and someone in her positions must be knowledgeable in the field, exercise great diplomacy and have empathy for others’ circumstances.

“Those characteristics are important whether you’re dealing with individual employees, unions or board members,” Krause said.

There are a lot of misperceptions about her job, Krause said, and she knows at times the job may appear to be one of rigidity.

“I would like our county employees to know sometimes over the years, even though I shared their frustrations, I had a responsibility to uphold certain laws, rules and regulations,” Krause said. “Following law, rule and procedure is a statutory regulation. It’s a big part of civil service.”

Krause said she would also like the community to know the county’s personnel department door is open, and the staff is approachable, whether by phone email or personal visit.

“I think many people have interacted with us through the exam process, but if any resident is out there and interested in county employment, the staff is here to help them with doing that in any way they can,” Krause said.

Krause, a female success story by any measure, said she recommends the mission of Girls Inc. of Central New York to guide women of all ages.

“Girls Inc. aims ‘To raise girls to be smart, strong and bold,’” said Krause, who is a past president of the organization. “So educate yourself. Receive as much training and education as possible – man or woman, that’s a big stepping stone outside the trades. Be strong in your self-esteem and belief in yourself so you are strong in the face of criticism. Finally, take risks and challenge yourself.”

Former Board of Supervisors Chairman Rocco J. DiVeronica said he has worked with Krause for many years.

“I have worked with Mary in different aspects of county business,” DiVeronica said. “From public relations to union contracts, she has been very professional and business-like.”

DiVeronica said Krause’s conduct of her responsibilities was pivotal in avoiding litigation in sensitive situations.

“If she had handled things differently, lawsuits could arise,” DiVeronica said. “She knows everything about our insurances and every part of the [county] budget. I think people are going to miss her interaction. I am glad for her. Maybe the new job will come with less stress. People don’t realize how much pressure there is in county business.”

Board of Supervisors Vice Chairman Richard O. Bargabos offered some comments last week at the County Board of Supervisors’ meeting. Bargabos, who chairs the Government Operations Committee, thanked Krause for her service to the county.

“You are an exceptional individual, outstanding manager and valued resource o the County Board of Resources,” Bargabos said. “You’ve developed a broad base of programs and developed a highly capable staff. You are hard-working, dedicated and never shied away from any responsibility. You always ran with the ball and did things outside of personnel because they had to get done. You never said, ‘I can’t,’ or ‘I don’t have time.’ We are very grateful and appreciative, and we’re going to miss you.”

In her free time, Krause plays golf, reads and has a long history of volunteerism with Birchwood in Liverpool, Hospice, Community Action Partnership, BRiDGES and Liberty Resources.

“In conducting myself personally, I have always enjoyed being involved in the community,” Krause said. “Whether through community service, serving on boards of directors and taking on leadership roles in those capacities, if people have the time, making contributions to the community can be an important addition to our own lives, and I recommend it to anyone.”

Cornell Chronicle, March 16, 2009, Monday

Cornell Chronicle

March 16, 2009, Monday

Cornell Chronicle

A sustainable business plan for ailing U.S. auto plants

By Peter Lazes

The GM and Chrysler bailouts provide an extraordinary opportunity for real change in our country. We can simultaneously save jobs and guarantee production of more energy-efficient transportation by converting car-company manufacturing space.

President Barack Obama should demand that the auto companies convert space to manufacture of non-automotive products capable of producing alternative energy equipment. Wind turbines and solar panels, along with energy-efficient light rail cars, subway cars and buses to improve our public transportation system, could be produced in the converted space.

Similar conversions were established during the 1940s as a result of the leadership and innovative approach of Walter Reuther, the president of the United Auto Workers union. Bucking significant resistance from auto companies, Reuther persuaded the Roosevelt administration in 1940 to force our auto companies to shift from domestic manufacturing to making military equipment, particularly aircraft. His plan capitalized on the skills of automotive workers and available space for manufacturing large equipment.

Conversion to passenger and freight trains and to alternative energy equipment such as wind turbines and solar panels is a practical way to make use of the skills of autoworkers and available production space. Currently, a Ford motor plant in St. Paul, Minn., is doing just this, with the help of McAllister University. Such a process with GM and Chrysler would help save jobs and create a robust environmental and mass transit manufacturing base in this country. It is estimated that this approach would result in the employment of more than 2 million workers. Universities such as Cornell should be required to partner with our auto companies to help rebuild our economy and save jobs.

The extraordinary financial meltdown affords the public an opportunity to demand an innovative federal investment in GM and Chrysler. Our government must force these companies and their suppliers to abrogate a "business as usual" model in favor of a broader and sweeping new business plan that redresses their failed approach, addresses new industrial needs for energy and environmental products, and helps to upgrade our public transportation system.

We need the leadership of President Obama, Congress and progressive union leaders to demand what Walter Reuther did during WWII: to stand up and be innovative, and to get our country and the auto industry to invest in our future rather than our past.

Will we have the courage and foresight to do this?

Peter Lazes is a senior extension associate at the ILR School in New York City. He directs strategic planning for unions and programs for economic transitions.

New York Times, March 16, 2009, Monday

New York Times

March 16, 2009, Monday

New York Times

Railroad Bailout May Offer a Model for Detroit


As General Motors and Chrysler struggle to remain solvent, the railroad bailout of a generation ago could offer a template to the Obama administration — one in which the federal government would run the auto companies until they are back on their feet.

That was a different age, of course. Congress was very much on board, supervising the reorganization of the bankrupt Northeastern railroads and then forming Conrail, in 1976, to run them. The auto companies, in contrast, are being pushed by the White House and Congress to reorganize themselves and remain private corporations, owned by shareholders.

Conrail presided over huge cutbacks in rail operations, leaving the railroad system with much less track and roughly half the number of employees. By 1981, it was turning a profit hauling freight, and eventually its operations were sold back to privately operated lines.

Five years after Conrail’s creation, Ronald Reagan became president and gave government takeovers a bad name by popularizing the view that government was inept in the marketplace. The Obama administration, respectful of this continuing view, wants the automakers to stand on their own, with only temporary federal loans to get them through the hard times.

“The ideological debate already in progress,” said Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, “is whether government should actually direct the auto companies, stepping into management, or passively give them more loans, and then get out of the way.”

The railroad failures in the Northeast, vividly evident in the 1970 bankruptcy of the Penn Central network, endangered an industry that President Gerald Ford and Congress considered vital to the nation’s well-being. The American-owned automakers are similarly regarded as vital; if not all three, then at least General Motors and Ford. Automaking in this country might not survive, this argument goes, without American companies at its core.

Their footprint in manufacturing is huge. Even now, no other industrial sector, except perhaps pharmaceuticals, spends more on research than the Big Three, according to the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich. The automakers are also the principal customers for the nation’s 6,000 independent auto parts makers.

“The hit to the parts makers if one or two of the Big Three disappeared would be so great that Toyota and Honda would have difficulty operating here, and they have said so publicly,” said Sean McAlinden, the center’s chief economist.

The Obama administration’s reaction, so far, has been to appoint a task force that is sorting out the viability of G.M. and Chrysler. The goal of the task force is to determine whether the automakers’ plans for survival — even the best laid plans — justify the risk of billions more in bridge loans, on top of the $17.4 billion already lent. The goal is to keep the companies alive, and out of bankruptcy, until auto sales climb back to a level that would permit them to survive on their own.

For that to happen, vehicle sales nationwide would have to reach at least 12.5 million to 13 million a year, G.M. said in the survival plan that it submitted to support its case for more federal loans. Ford and Chrysler offer similar estimates. The annualized sales rate in February, in contrast, was only nine million. And months may pass before that rate climbs back to 12.5 million or 13 million — a pace associated with upturns in the economy or milder recessions than this one.

Whatever the dangers of persistently weak sales, “the task force does not seem to be going in the direction of running the auto companies, even though that might be a fine idea,” said Dan Luria, research director for the Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center, who has spoken with some of the 21 task force members.

None has spoken publicly yet. But there are eerie similarities in the unwinding of the railroads in the 1970s and the American-owned automakers today.

Hurricane Agnes, sweeping through the Northeast in 1972, did roughly the same damage to the railroads as the devastating recession is doing today to the auto industry. The hurricane flooded hundreds of miles of track, precipitating more bankruptcies among already weakened railroad companies operating lines from Boston west to Chicago and St. Louis.

The biggest bankruptcy was in 1970, when Penn Central went under, leaving lenders, mainly banks, holding $100 million in suddenly worthless commercial paper. In what turned out to be a preview for today, the Federal Reserve pumped reserves into the damaged banks, just as it is doing now on a broader basis.

More to the point, if the auto companies declared bankruptcy, shedding their debts, then Washington would be under pressure to cover a shortfall of more than $30 billion in retiree benefits, mainly for health care.

The Obama task force itself has a rough parallel in the railroad crisis. Congress created a similar commission in 1973, on the heels of Agnes, to lay out a course of action that would make the railroads workable in their competition with truckers for freight. About 12,000 miles of underused track were abandoned, the work force was cut to 50,000 from 100,000, and unprofitable passenger services were jettisoned.

The American auto companies are similarly slimming down, but ad hoc in response to a recession that has destroyed their sales. Factories have been closed, car models dropped and 235,000 auto workers have lost their jobs in the last year, or 25 percent of those making vehicles and parts.

Pay is also shrinking. With the tacit agreement of the United Automobile Workers, wage rates are gradually being cut to the levels paid by the foreign auto companies assembling vehicles here, in nonunion plants.

“The U.A.W. realized that bailout money would not be provided unless it brought wages and even benefits into line with those of the transplants,” said Harry Katz, a labor economist and dean of Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations. “That was the standard that moderate Democrats accepted.”

Despite the cost cutting, the American auto companies may need federal loans for many months to stay afloat. Faced with that same situation in the 1970s, Congress created Conrail to run bankrupt freight lines in the Northeast and Midwest.

Five years later, the government-run company earned its first profit. In time Conrail disappeared, its operations sold to commercial railroads that dominate freight traffic today across the country and do so profitably.

But there is a difference. Railroads, regulated for decades, had come to be viewed as public utilities, and federal ownership was not unimaginable, said John McArthur, dean emeritus of the Harvard Business School and a Penn Central bankruptcy trustee.

“Discussions about the American railroad system and its shortcomings went on all through the first half of the 20th century,” he said, “and when the crisis came, there was a consensus how to proceed. Today, our society has yet to decide whether we want government-owned auto companies.”

The Buffalo News, March 14, 2009, Saturday

The Buffalo News

March 14, 2009, Saturday

The Buffalo News

American Axle auditors warn of concerns over viability

- American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, the supplier whose biggest customers are General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, said it may breach terms of its loan agreements and be unable to stay in business.

Compliance with financial covenants is “uncertain” because of doubts about the survival of GM and Chrysler, which account for about 84 percent of sales, the company said in a U. S. regulatory filing Friday. American Axle’s auditors said there was “substantial doubt” about the company’s viability.

That “could be a last straw for bank lenders who are already nervous about the sector,” said Shelly Lombard, an analyst at bond-research firm Gimme Credit LLC. Questions about Detroit-based American Axle’s viability may make banks less inclined to rework debt accords, she said.

American Axle’s Buffalo area presence is a fraction of what it was when the auto parts maker acquired some of General Motors” operations in the mid 1990s.

It operates a machining plant in Cheektowaga, after shutting its forge in the Town of Tonawanda and its gear and axle plant in Buffalo. The Walden Avenue plant has less than 100 hourly and salaried employees, said Renee Rogers, a company spokeswoman.

The workforce includes 62 hourly employees, several of whom are on layoff, said Jim Lakeman, president of United Auto Workers Local 846.

American Axle’s Buffalo gear and axle plant, which in recent years had more than 2,000 employees, was idled in late 2007 before being officially closed in 2008. The Tonawanda forge had 530 employees as of early last year. The company has sold both of those facilities.

Art Wheaton, director of labor studies at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations, said the parts supplier faces an uphill battle if seeks outside financial support. GM, for one, is focused on its own problems and possibly taking on portions of Delphi Corp., he said.

Wheaton said he felt the company’s decision to close the Tonawanda forge left the Cheektowaga plant more vulnerable, since the Walden Avenue plant used to machine parts made by the forge.

But he said the UAW has shown cooperation in supporting the operation. The Cheektowaga plant opened a decade ago under a lower-wage structure, and UAW members agreed to reduced wages there under a contract approved last year.

American Axle’s filing shows how U. S. auto sales at a 27-year low may overwhelm suppliers” efforts to save themselves by shutting plants and chopping payrolls. As many as 500 of the biggest domestic partsmakers may be at risk of failure, accounting firm Grant Thornton LLP said Thursday.

News Business Reporter Matt Glynn contributed to this report.

Christian Science Monitor, March 12, 2009, Thursday

Copyright 2009 The Christian Science Publishing Society
All Rights Reserved
Christian Science Monitor

March 12, 2009, Thursday

HEADLINE: Unions' dilemma on layoffs: to compromise or not?

BYLINE: Amanda Paulson Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

BODY:
In Lynn, Mass., teachers saved more than 100 jobs by agreeing to work one unpaid day this year.
But in nearby Boston, the teachers union has so far rejected a proposal that all unionized city workers accept a wage freeze for next year or face large layoffs.
The faltering economy has put unions at a crossroads nationwide: How much should they compromise with cash-strapped cities, counties, and states trimming their wage bill?
So far, unions have frequently shown a willingness to make concessions - realizing that their members are not im-mune from the crisis. But in many cases, they are balking at the stark terms being proposed. It points to a growing showdown between unions and employers, as each contests the other's appraisal of the situation and the remedies that will be sufficient.
"We don't have our heads in the sand. We know what's going on," says Gordon Pavy, director of collective bar-gaining for the AFL-CIO. "We benefit on the upside, and on the downside, we have to take our lumps like everyone else."
Terms are negotiable
He says it is not unusual for unions to work with employers to find solutions that save jobs in times of recession, even if it means making major concessions on wages or taking unpaid furlough days. Still, city and state leaders seem to be taking their demand for concessions to the courts or to the media rather than negotiating in good faith, Mr. Pavy says.
For example:
* In California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger implemented a mandatory policy of two furlough days a month poli-cy for many state workers, which unions opposed. They sued to stop the program and lost, though they are appealing the decision. Governor Schwarzenegger also won a lawsuit that gives him the right to cut state workers' wages to the federal minimum wage when lawmakers can't pass a budget on time. In response, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1000, which represents some 95,000 state workers, recently cut a deal with the state involving nu-merous concessions in the hope of avoiding layoffs or worse concessions.
* In Detroit, the mayor has asked unions to agree to a 10-percent pay cut or face major layoffs - a request local unions are balking at granting.
* In Oregon, the local SEIU chapter actually approached the governor with a list of concessions - including a wage freeze for two years and eight unpaid furlough days this year. The state has since determined those cuts won't be enough, and is asking the union for more. Negotiations resumed this week.
"We thought, 'We get it, the economy is bad,' and we thought we'd do something to preempt it," says Kermit Meling, a transportation worker who chairs the bargaining committee for SEIU Local 503. "We thought we were fairly close, and then we got blindsided by them coming back and wanting to take a lot more."
Where's the limit?
How much unions are willing to give away can depend on their relations with the local government, where unions are in their contracts, and how real they believe the risk is of severe layoffs. Cutting teaching and police jobs right now can be politically difficult, for instance, no matter how dire the budget situation.

"Unions and union members tend to feel the same as anyone right now - that you're lucky to have a job," says Rebecca Given, a professor of collective bargaining at Cornell University's Institute of Labor Relations. "On the other hand, there's a lot of anxiety right now around pensions. They're going to want to make sure that pensions remain untouched."

Professor Given notes that there's also a debate within many unions about what's known as "selling out your unborn" - agreeing to a lesser salary and terms for any new employees.

That is one issue in Boston. Mayor Thomas Menino has reached a deal with one union, the Association of Federal, State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), to accept a wage freeze in exchange for a promise of no layoffs. But other unions - like the teachers and police - are willing to put the jobs of their least senior members at risk, say crit-ics.
"There's a history, at least in this state: The unions eat their young," says Samuel Tyler, president of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau, a city watchdog agency. He says the wage freeze - which would expire before the end of the year - is necessary to keep the city solvent.
"The ones making decisions are the more senior teachers in unions, and they want to retain what in their minds are hard-fought wins in negotiations and not give anything up," Mr. Tyler adds.
The local teachers' union chafes at that characterization, insisting that they're not averse to working with the city. But they want a more complete picture of how many layoffs would occur and how the situation would be affected by coming federal stimulus money.
In California, there is evidence that concessions can help. The deal offered by SEIU Local 1000, while including significant concessions, may leave the union's members in a much better position than that of other state workers. In-stead of taking two unpaid furlough days a month, its members are taking one, with more flexibility about when it oc-curs. The union also got a guarantee that layoffs will only occur if a department or office is entirely closed and there is no equivalent work nearby.

"We knew concessions would have to be made," says Jim Zamora, a spokesperson for the union. "The most important thing is that people don't want to lose their jobs."
(c) Copyright 2009. The Christian Science Monitor

LOAD-DATE: March 11, 2009

Contra Costa Times (California), March 12, 2009, Thursday

Copyright 2009 Contra Costa Newspapers

All Rights Reserved

Contra Costa Times (California)

March 12, 2009, Thursday

HEADLINE: Byron Williams: Act would make American workers too big to fail

BYLINE: By Byron Williams Columnist

BODY:

IN THESE UNPREDICTABLE economic times, it is common to hear the bipartisan mantra that some corporations or industries are "too big to fail." Seldom do we hear these words about the American worker.

In the failure to include the American worker into this premium category, are we are doing ourselves a disservice?

To this end, there are several pieces of legislation introduced this week in Congress, along with a bipartisan coalition of co-sponsors known as the "Employee Free Choice Act."

The bill is designed to enable working people to bargain for better benefits, wages and working conditions by restoring workers' freedom to choose for themselves whether to join a union.

This is undoubtedly important labor legislation. I've received calls urging me to look at this bill from as far as Washington, D.C. as well as from local representatives in Oakland.

If passed, the Employee Free Choice Act would:

Remove current obstacles to employees who want collective bargaining.

Guarantee that workers who can choose collective bargaining are able to achieve a contract.

Allow employees to form unions by signing cards authorizing union representation.

The Employee Free Choice Act was introduced last year; it passed in the House, carried a majority in the Senate, but was not filibuster proof. Assuming Al Franken is the ultimate victor in the Minnesota Senate race, Democrats would only need to peel away one Republican senator to conduct an up-or-down vote.

The public perception may be the proposed legislation is already law, but over the past two-plus decades, there has been a systematic attempt to reduce the influence of organized labor in the American marketplace.

According to a study conducted by Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of Labor Education Research at Cornell University:

Ninety-two percent of private-sector employers, when faced with employees who want to join together in a union, force employees to attend closed-door meetings to hear anti-union rhetoric.

Eighty percent require supervisors to attend training sessions on attacking unions.

Seventy-eight percent require that supervisors deliver anti-union messages to workers they oversee.

Seventy-five percent hire outside consultants to run anti-union campaigns.

Half of employers threaten to shut down partially or totally if employees join together in a union.

The current U.S. labor laws do not prohibit the harassment, coercion and intimidation outlined in Bronfenbrenner's study.

It comes as little surprise many within the business community oppose the Employee Free Choice Act. A popular red herring is to use the automobile industry as Exhibit A.

"To have a union increases wages and benefits, just look at the problems that Ford, GM, and Chrysler are experiencing now" is how the argument goes. The problem with this argument is that organized labor is not responsible for the mishaps in research and design. Nor are they responsible for the increasing gap between CEO salaries and the pay of the average worker.

The decline of labor began in the early 1980s when corporations made the argument that they would inherently do the right the thing, so they told workers there's no need to organize.

Beth Schulman, author of "The Betrayal of Work: How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans" and board member of the American Rights at Work calls this phenomenon the "deregulation of the labor market."

"Working people getting into middle class doesn't come down from the sky; it requires a strong labor movement and progressive legislation," she said.

If America is indeed a consumer driven economy, by what other means can the myriad individuals who work in the hotel and nursing home industries, provide janitorial services and retail industry, as well as other low-wage service jobs, which are an increasingly important segment of the economy, participate lest they be organized? And they can only organize if given a free choice.

"The Employee Free Choice Act," Schulman said, "doesn't change anything. It just makes the existing laws work."

My reading of the Employee Free Choice Act inclines me to agree with Schulman's assessment, I would add one caveat if passed it also offers the potential of adding workers, low-wage earners in particular, to the illustrious category of "too big to fail."

Byron Williams is an Oakland pastor and is a columnist for the Bay Area News Group-East Bay. E-mail him at byron@byronspeaks.com or leave a message at 510-208-6417.

GRAPHIC:

LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2009

US Fed News, March 12, 2009, Thursday

Copyright 2009 HT Media Ltd.
All Rights Reserved
US Fed News

March 12, 2009, Thursday

HEADLINE: Firm in Buffalo, NY, to Receive $500 Fine, Make Changes Under Settlement Agreement with NRC

BODY:
WASHINGTON, March 11 -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the following press release:
Quality Inspection Services, Inc., (QISI) of Buffalo, N.Y., has agreed to implement a broad range of corrective ac-tions related to radiation safety and pay a $500 fine under an agreement reached with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The settlement with the company was achieved under the NRC's Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) process, which was initiated at the request of QISI to address a willful violation of NRC regulations involving the use of an industrial radiography facility the company owns in Manchester, Conn. The violation was identified by the NRC during an inspection and an investigation by the agency's Office of Investigations. Specifically, the NRC found there was a willful failure on the part of a QISI site Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) to maintain utilization logs for each sealed radioactive source at the site. NRC reviews determined that the RSO performed radiographic operations at the Manchester location on several occasions between Nov. 15, 2006, and March 2, 2007, without keeping such logs. Among other things, these logs capture whether safety procedures were followed. During industrial radiography operations, metal parts and welds can be inspected for flaws. A sealed radioactive source beams radiation at the object to be checked. Special photographic, or radiographic, film on the opposite side of the source is exposed when it is struck by the radiation passing through. Structural problems can be detected by studying the film. On Sept. 15, 2008, the NRC proposed a $6,500 civil penalty for QISI for the violation. In the letter to the company notifying it of the enforcement action, QISI was offered an opportunity to use the ADR process. ADR is a process in which a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the parties in reaching an agreement on the resolution of any differences regarding an action. QISI, in turn, requested the use of ADR, and an ADR mediation session was held on Jan. 22, 2009, at the Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution at Cornell University, in Ithaca, N.Y. During that session, a preliminary settlement was reached. The agreement has now been finalized. As part of the settlement agreement, QISI has agreed to take a number of actions. They include: (1) revising the existing operations and emergency (O&E) manual to emphasize the importance of safe performance of radiography, strict compliance with requirements, being complete and accurate in all communications, and understanding that engaging in any willful misconduct will not be tolerated; (2) retraining all employees regarding the revisions to the O&E manual; (3) adding a radiation safety component to the existing corporate newsletter, to be issued at least quarterly, focusing on radiation safety updates; (4) developing a video recording that will include the message emphasizing the importance of safety and compliance with the requirements; it will be required viewing for all company employees who are involved in any manner in activities subject to NRC jurisdiction, and will be placed on the QISI web site for employee viewing and access; (5) placing the video on the QISI public web site, and offering to make the video available for a presentation at a national industry conference; (6) increasing the audits of each of the radiographers working in areas of NRC jurisdiction to three times annually for two years; and (7) including, as part of the next two NRC-required annual reviews of the company's radiation safety programs, an inquiry (independent of the corporate radiation safety officer) of all radiographers working in NRC jurisdiction, to assess the effectiveness of adherence to NRC requirements. QISI also agreed to send the NRC a letter documenting completion of the actions within 30 days after they have been done. In recognition of these actions, as well as the corrective actions already taken by QISI, the NRC has agreed to reduce the amount of the civil penalty to $500. A copy of the enforcement action will be posted on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions.For more information please contact: Sarabjit Jagirdar, Email:- htsyndication@hindustantimes.com

LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2009

National Public Radio (NPR), March 6, 2009, Friday

Copyright 2009 National Public Radio (R)

All Rights Reserved

National Public Radio (NPR)


March 6, 2009, Friday

HEADLINE: Unemployment Numbers Add To Economic Gloom

BODY:

ROBERT SIEGEL, host:

From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Robert Siegel.

MELISSA BLOCK, host:

And I'm Melissa Block. The Labor Department says unemployment surged above 8 percent last month. That's a figure we haven't seen since the Reagan administration. Also in February, the economy shed 651,000 jobs. NPR's Frank Langfitt reports on just a few of the faces behind those numbers.

FRANK LANGFITT: When the job numbers came out this morning, economists turned to language like this: horrendous, staring into the abyss. Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial, was a little more restrained, but not much.

Mr. STUART HOFFMAN (Chief Economist, PNC Financial): Job losses are just, unfortunately, fast and furious. There is no particular light at the end of this tunnel.

LANGFITT: Hoffman says one thing driving the continued job loss is consumer spending. There's not enough of it, and that's starving the economy. Hoffman says that after years of spending wildly, many Americans have done a u-turn, pinching pennies as they fear the worst.

Mr. HOFFMAN: Frankly, we're caught in the grips of what I call a national financial anxiety attack.

LANGFITT: In the monthly employment report, the big numbers, like those huge job losses you just heard, they get the attention. But other government data paint a more nuanced picture of the labor market and how it's changing. In this recession, men are taking the brunt of job losses. Francine Blau says it's because they work in the hardest-hit sectors. Blau is a labor economist at Cornell.

Professor FRANCINE BLAU (Labor Economist, Cornell): Men are, compared to women, disproportionally represented in manufacturing and construction jobs.

LANGFITT: And that's leaving some women to pick up the slack when their husbands are laid off. That's what happened to Roger and Carolyn(ph) Anderson. Roger did designs for water and sewage-treatment systems for housing developments in Florida. But when the real estate bubble burst, he lost his job and a $45,000-a-year salary. Since then, Carolyn has taking on more work, cleaning mobile homes. Roger explains.

Mr. ROGER ANDERSON: (Water Treatment Systems Designer): She only charges them like 30, $35. So she's doing two or three a day. Lately, sometimes she'll go and work on Saturday. You know, I keep telling her she doesn't really have to, but she will.

LANGFITT: Roger says the growing workload is tough on his wife, who has a history of back problems. And he says she's more stressed.

Mr. ANDERSON: If a bill comes in that's a little bigger than normal or something breaks down or that type of thing, she starts, you know, quizzing me all the time. You know, is this okay? Are we are going to be okay? And, you know, do I need to get more jobs - this kind of stuff. She gets panicky.

LANGFITT: Roger says he always helped out around home, but these days even more so.

Mr. ANDERSON: Now that it's just her working, as I do - I clean the house for her now. I try to do some of the laundry.

LANGFITT: Roger Anderson says he has been hunting for work for more than a year, but without any luck. And that's not surprising. The construction business on which Anderson's work depended shed more than 100,000 jobs last month. That's not to say there aren't any jobs in the country. Education, government and health care continue to grow, and even in manufacturing, which has bled jobs for years, there are small bright spots.

Mr. MIKE PETTERS (Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding): Over the next 12 months or so, we expect to hire about 4,000 people.

LANGFITT: That's Mike Petters. He runs Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. The company builds aircraft carriers, destroyers and subs, things the government orders long in advance and don't depend on consumer spending.

Mr. PETTERS: You know, we have an advantage that many businesses don't have. We are able to see beyond next quarter. Just last year, the shipyard in Virginia participated in signing two contracts with the Navy that will carry work out through the middle of next decade.

LANGFITT: Petters plans to hire electricians, welders and pipe fitters. He says salaries could reach 40 to $50,000 a year with overtime. But hiring like this is rare these days, and most people are just trying to hold on to what they have. Since the recession began in December of 2007, the economy has lost more than 4 million jobs.

Frank Langfitt, NPR News, Washington.

LOAD-DATE: March 10, 2009

Thursday, March 05, 2009

The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 6, 2009, Friday

Copyright 2009 The Chronicle of Higher Education
All Rights Reserved
The Chronicle of Higher Education

March 6, 2009, Friday


HEADLINE: 'Golden Walk' Gets a Makeover From an Auditor of Campus Visits

BYLINE: ERIC HOOVER

DATELINE: York, Pa.

BODY:
A visitor arrives at 9:30 a.m. and tucks a camera into his coat pocket. From the parking lot he studies the still-hushed campus before him. He eyes the brick buildings, the crisscrossing walkways, the frozen grass. For a moment he gazes at a lone tree as if its bare branches dangle clues.

His name is Jeff Kallay, and he has come here to find the soul of York College of Pennsylvania.
A consultant on an endless road trip, Mr. Kallay travels the nation visiting colleges and universities that hire him to conduct a "campus visit audit." After each tour, he discusses his first impressions with admissions officials. Later he sends them a detailed report, with recommendations covering the logistical aspects of visits, such as parking and sig-nage. He also considers aesthetics, right down to the dust bunnies he finds in stairwells.

But beauty is not Mr. Kallay's main concern. His business cards identify him as an "experience evangelist," and wherever he goes he preaches the gospel of good vibrations. He believes that intangibles -- like listening and eye contact -- do more than any dormitory or library can to make a student's visit memorable.

In his evaluations, Mr. Kallay rates the experiential qualities of each visit: Do visitors get a warm welcome from security guards and secretaries? Do tour guides ask open-ended questions? Does something fun happen?

The answers have bottom-line implications. Long known as the "golden walk," the campus visit is a crucial ritual. Research shows that it greatly influences a prospective applicant's decision to apply to a college -- and an accepted student's decision to enroll. So creating a bang-up tour would behoove any institution.

It's an open secret, however, that many visits are bland and predictable. Or, as Mr. Kallay puts it, "inauthentic experiences run by PR-spewing tour bots."

Why? For one thing, he says, many colleges try too hard to promote themselves as places with everything for eve-ryone. Campus visits often seem like careful exercises in sameness, set to a numbing drone of superlatives. That leaves students and parents starved for something real, Mr. Kallay believes. He urges colleges to clearly express what they are -- and what they are not.
His growing client list suggests that he has staked out a new frontier in college marketing. "Many places just don't put energy into it," he says of visits. "The irony is that here are colleges,
places of total experience, that don't sell them-selves as experiences."

To put it another way, Mr. Kallay thinks colleges could learn a few things from one of the world's most recogniza-ble hosts: that walking, talking mouse named Mickey.
'A Human Feeling'

Mr. Kallay figures he has visited Walt Disney World about 150 times. Growing up near Orlando, Fla., he and his brother spent days riding the Space Mountain roller coaster and swimming in the resort's pools. At a special all-night party for high-school seniors, he and his friends danced into the night as the Pointer Sisters played.

Disney sells memories, and Mr. Kallay would come to believe that colleges do something similar. "What you love is the memory," he says "There's a human feeling we have when we're somewhere with family and friends. Disney is just the stage for it."

The company also built its reputation on customer service and storytelling. Mr. Kallay practiced both arts as a stu-dent tour guide at Lee University, in Cleveland, Tenn. When he showed guests around, he'd relay his personal expe-riences. He also spoke frankly. "The straight-A students live over here," he would say, pointing. "The troglodytes live over there."
After graduating with a bachelor's degree in communications, in 1986, Mr. Kallay worked in Lee's admissions of-fice as director of recruitment. Later he dabbled in marketing and advertising, steeping himself in consumer psychology. Then, in 1999, James H. Gilmore and B. Joseph Pine II published The Experience Economy: Work Is Theater & Every Business a Stage. The book expanded on the controversial idea that to keep customers, companies should create expe-riences for them. The memories of those experiences then become the product, and an emotional bond is formed.
Mr. Kallay had found his sacred text. Soon he joined a higher-education consulting firm in Atlanta, where he first connected the tenets of the "experience economy" to campus tours. In 2006 he left to work for his current employer, TargetX, a Pennsylvania-based company that specializes in student-recruitment strategies.
Since then Mr. Kallay has worked with 70 colleges, and he visits as many as eight campuses a month. His rates range from $2,500 to $20,000, depending on a college's needs and the number of work days required. Recently, he hired an assistant.
On this Wednesday morning in February, Mr. Kallay arrives at York College just as snow starts to pelt the campus. It's a powerful reminder that some aspects of any visit are beyond human control.
Inside the administration building, Nancy C. Spataro has high hopes for Mr. Kallay, whom she has heard speak at conferences. The admissions director thinks that York's tour is good, but not great. "We want to make it a 'wow,'" she tells him.
First, Mr. Kallay says, the college needs a sign directing visitors from the parking lot to the admissions office, which shares a lobby in the crowded administration building. Ms. Spataro has long wished that her staff had its own building, with much more space to receive the 3,500 annual visitors, give group presentations, and maybe offer some refreshments. After all, a slew of colleges have recently opened plush welcome centers.
Mr. Kallay says York's lobby does not convey college. With a grin he points to a framed reproduction on the wall. "What the hell does Georgia O'Keeffe have to do with York College?"
More Storytelling
Next Mr. Kallay goes undercover. He joins a half-dozen parents and high-school students on a tour led by Alex Crouse, a junior who earns $7 for each 90-minute outing. In his green York jacket, the student is low-key and likable, canned jokes and all.
Mr. Kallay is here to find flaws, though, and so he does. "It's always the same," he whispers after a few minutes. "Walk into a building and talk about it. Blah, blah, blah."
Sure enough, this tour, like many others, is a trot through and around buildings. The routine confirms that the li-brary has books and computers. That the student center has a cafeteria. That the athletics center has exercise bikes. This could be almost anywhere.
All the while, Mr. Kallay snaps photographs. Around each corner he looks for "cues," the positive and negative messages he believes campuses send to visitors. When the group enters a dorm lobby, for instance, the young woman at the sign-in desk sends a negative cue by not looking up from her knitting. The sad, blue couches in the hall send one. The just-for-show dorm room, with its weathered throw rug and the cockeyed Green Day poster, sends the wrong signal, too.
Mr. Kallay winces as he surveys the scene. Click goes his camera.
When the tour ends, he has seen a lot of York, including its stunning new performing-arts center. The essence of the place -- its Yorkness -- eludes him, however.
For much of the afternoon, Mr. Kallay leads a conversation about how to reveal that essence. Brainstorming with Ms. Spataro and her staff, he starts with a question: If York College were a car, a restaurant, or a retailer, what would it be?
"The Olive Garden," says Ms. Spataro, who says the college offers a good but inexpensive education.
York's tuition is about $12,000. and many of its 4,600 full-time students are the first in their families to attend col-lege. York tends to compete more with the region's public universities than with the much pricier private colleges. So, the group agrees, the tour could better distinguish York from larger campuses by emphasizing its intimacy.
To that end, Mr. Kallay says, visitors must encounter more people, particularly faculty members. As it is, visiting students talk with professors only if they have scheduled a meeting in advance. "The tour is too isolated," the consultant says. "We were in a bubble out there."
Mr. Kallay mentions the knitting girl. The admissions staff must reach out to students, encourage them to say "hel-lo" to tour groups, he says. Moreover, they must do something about the empty dorm room. "It's dead," he tells them, "like a mausoleum up there."
Two members of the admissions staff grimace. "It's the best we have," says one. Mr. Kallay encourages them to let visitors peek into a room where students actually live, clutter and all.
He suggests that York could do many other things as well. Like create a "signature moment," something visitors can do or touch, perhaps something involving "The Rock," the big stone that seniors here autograph each spring.
Consider ways to engage all five senses, Mr. Kallay says. He likes that there is a jar of York Peppermint Patties -- a local creation -- that greets visitors when they sign in, but he says someone should hand the candies to visitors.
Later, Mr. Kallay meets with "the ambassadors," York's student tour guides. "You're the most important people in the admissions process," he tells them. "Your job is to be master storytellers."
He delivers a fast-paced talk that explains how iPods and Starbucks have changed consumers' brains. The students are captivated.
They get various tips: Do not walk backward, because it's awkward and slows down the tour. Do not tell parents there is no drinking on the campus, because they will not believe you. Do not play dumb when visitors ask about crime.
Mr. Kallay throws them questions: "What's the teacher-student ratio here?"
"15 to 1," says one student.
"Blah, blah, blah," Mr. Kallay says. "Now tell me the story behind those numbers."
One student says he and a professor send text messages to each other all the time. Another says her favorite professor once noticed that she was very down and invited her to come stay with her family for the night. A third describes how he and a professor have a secret handshake.
Mr. Kallay nods approvingly. He asks if anyone can tell a story about how he or she grew while at York.
One young woman describes how as a freshman she was scared and lonely, crying herself to sleep for weeks. Now a senior, she came to love York, has many friends, and is the student-government president.
"Yes, yes, yes," Mr. Kallay says. "See? That's a great story."
'Sense of Culture'

The evolution of campus visits would seem like a natural progression in the the recruitment of today's highly cod-dled students. For better or worse, many applicants carry a sense of entitlement into the college-search process. "We know this generation is different from other generations," says Ronald G. Ehrenberg, director of the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute. "Once they get to college, they think, 'We're entitled to positive experiences because we've paid a lot of money to come here.'"

Although Mr. Kallay is the nation's first full-time campus tourist, he is not the first to advise colleges on their cam-pus-visit strategies. Take the Art & Science Group, a marketing company that works with colleges. The group, has polled students to determine the most important factor in their choices of college. Sixty-five percent cited the campus visit, while only 26 percent cited college Web sites.
Admissions-office budgets, however, do not usually reflect that breakdown, says Richard A. Hesel, a principal with the company. "Colleges will spend thousands on Web sites and mailings, but the most decisive thing is treated way too casually. We invariably give advice about tours, but in most cases things don't actually change. It's a difficult thing to train students every year."
And even a well-trained tour guide cannot please everyone. Mark C. Moody, a director of college counseling at the Colorado Academy, a private school in Denver, has seen students sour on campuses because they did not like something about their tour guides -- perhaps how they spoke or how they wore their hair. But students come back buzzing about how many friendly people they met.
"It's always about people and the sense of culture, not the facilities," Mr. Moody says. "Seventeen-year-olds are looking for people like them, a sense of the place that's elusive."
One challenge for colleges is that campuses, like towns or cities, do not reveal all of their treasures in one afternoon. Another is that campuses, particularly large ones, are a complex mesh of subcultures, whose members may experience the same campus quite differently. That complicates the quest for authenticity.
Mr. Kallay concedes as much. Over dinner after his visit to York College, a discussion of marketing messages leads back to Disney World. "In some ways, I hate Disney," he says. Then he takes back the verb.
What the man who grew up exploring the Magic Kingdom means is that he understands the downside of its pecu-liar brand of magic. After all, the place is superficial, unreal, always on message -- things he tells colleges not to be. "Disney does some things well," he says. "But is it authentic? No, it's so manufactured."
Just as Mickey Mouse is complicated, so, too, is overhauling a campus tour.
But the next day at York, Mr. Kallay sees progress. He and the admissions officials meet with two senior adminis-trators, who are receptive to many of his suggestions for revamping the tour. By the time he leaves, he expects that the campus will get better signs. Pending the president's approval, the admissions office would get its own space for wel-coming visitors in the student center. The tour would include the new residence halls on the west side of the campus. And one senior admissions official would become full-time director of campus visits.
A week later, Ms. Spataro says her guides are psyched, already having incorporated many of Mr. Kallay's sugges-tions.
The experience evangelist is happy. "It's a very good start," he says. "I converted 'em, dude!"

LOAD-DATE: March 2, 2009